World War I is a huge topic that provides many interesting micro-topics to investigate. As a class I can't cover all this information or topics unless I stand and talk the whole time....let's face it no one wants this! Thus an opportunity for you (and a partner if you choose) to dig deeper into a topic that is of interest to you and then briefly share your findings with the class.
Goal of project: to continue using research and evaluative questions and produce a short final product (4-6 content slides) on your topic.
Part 1: Pick your topic (pick something of interest, pass it by me first) and figure out a good research question. A question that you know there is an answer to.
Some topic ideas:
-propaganda
-Canada's coming of age, nationhood achieved
-Canadian battles (Vimy, Paschendale, Somme, Ypres are some of the biggies)
-War technology
-Internment
-Canadian autonomy
-Indigenous roles in WWI
-Women, changing women’s roles in WWI
-Suffrage
-trench warfare
-Treaty of Versailles
-Canada's war effort at home
-treatment of enemy aliens
Part 2: Research your topic and question. Take notes to answer your question, ask more questions and go deeper if needed. (I'm marking the research process: question, notes) paraphrase and write your notes up in your words! **You must use at least one book!! You must have at least one quote to support your question (and put into your final slides). **Don't forget to record your sources! You will submit your notes sheet.
Part 3: Evaluate your research. Come up with an evaluative question (can tie into historical thinking questions). Do any further research to completely answer your research question.
Part 4: create your final product with a bibliography (in Chicago style).
Part 5: submit by Friday June 13th, we will present Gallery style.
| Approaching Expectations | Meeting Expectations | Exceeding Expectations |
Use of Time | -poor use of time -needed several reminders to stay on task | -satisfactory use of time -on task most of the time
| -excellent use of time -on task all of the time
|
Evidence of Research: notes, bibliography, inquiry question | -no bibliography or less than 3 relevant sources cited -many sources are not cited -minimal analysis of sources -minimal effort to go through the process of inquiry -little or no notes included
| -bibliography contains at least three relevant and reliable sources in Chicago citation style -evidence of cross referencing sources -some analysis of all sources to answer a focus question or develop a big idea -most sources are cited -notes are included
| -bibliography contains more than three sources in Chicago citation style -extensive research is evident through detailed notes, analysis and cross referencing -thoughtful analysis of sources to answer inquiry question or develop a big idea -all sources are cited -excellent effort on inquiry process
|
Conventions: grammar, spelling, layout
|
| -good effort to proofread and has few errors -good effort to provide a layout that enhances flow of project
| -clearly proofread for understanding -no spelling or grammar errors -layout enhances project
|
Content: Demonstrates knowledge of topic & answers inquiry question | -limited knowledge of the topic evident -inquiry question not answered -information not clearly presented
| -good knowledge of topic -information is presented in a satisfactory fashion -topic is covered but needs more depth -good effort to answer inquiry question or create a big idea
| -excellent knowledge of topic -big idea/inquiry question clearly answered or developed -information is well presented
|
Presentation: -Clarity of information -Creativity -Neat -Organization & layout | -Limited effort to organize and clearly present information -Not much effort put into creative elements to present topic -lacks neatness
| -good effort to organize and present big ideas or answer inquiry question -good use of creative elements -thought was put into final product -visually pleasing -neat
| -information is clearly and thoughtfully presented and organized -lots of thought put into final product making it interesting and visually pleasing -exceptional use of creative elements to present topic -leaves an impression on the viewer
|
Comments: |
|
No comments:
Post a Comment