Socials 10: Historical Wrongs project

 

HISTORICAL WRONGS PROJECT:

-further research either the residential school apology or another government apology in Canadian history & create a short visual display including bibliography  (examples:  Ukrainian/Japanese/Italian internment, Komagata Maru, Chinese Head tax, Residential Schools, the St. Lewis)

1.  Notes  - create a solid set of written notes on your topic of choice, think 5W+H

2.  Visual display to communicate learning. (poster, power point, sway, photo collage etc...)

3.  Bibliography in Chicago style

-ensure you provide background info from both perspectives of the issue (for example:  Why the Canadian Govmt created Residential Schools and how Indigenous people felt about these schools --at the time).

-give time frame of initial issue, (ex. when Residential Schools started/ended)

-when the government apologized & why they apologized including what provoked the apology (ie, what was the catalyst).  Did the apology include a monetary piece?

-any other pertinent information

Marking criteria presentation:  Historical Wrongs/Apologies                        Name(s):

Historical Wrong:

Criteria:	Met	S/W	Not yet
Content: - easy to understand and to the point               - provides background information, perspectives, timeframe
Slides:  easy to follow and read (ie. not too much information)
Presentation: Volume                       Engaging (look at audience)                       Told not read
Information on topic communicated in a purposeful and insightful manor

Comments:

Here is the peer assessment you will be completing:

Peer Assessment:  Historical wrongs

Name(s) of whose project it is:_________________________  Topic: _____________________

Your name:

Criteria:	Met	S/W	Not yet met
Content:  -Easy to understand, to the point                 -Includes background info, timeframe, perspectives
Slides:  -Easy to follow/understand               -Not too much information per slide
Presentation:  -Volume (you can hear them easily)                        -Information is told not read                        -Engaging, they look at audience

One thing you liked about presentation:	One thing they could do better next time: